cursors problem

hi i am getting that message to update field value into table
Msg 16933, Level 16, State 1, Procedure RmDupValWSWCode, Line 39
The cursor does not include the table being modified or the table is not
updatable through the cursor.
I have two databases with same tables, in one database it work on that table
but in another database its not working on the same table with the same
data......
why cursor behave like thatHello!
Could you post your code?
Thanks!|||Since you haven't posted the code. I am guessing :)
are you using the two part name where ever you refer to the table.
I mean refer to all the table names as
dbo.table1
or whichever schema you are using.
Hope this helps.|||Also, make sure the user running the stored procedure has access to the
tables.
"Omnibuzz" <Omnibuzz@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2919D9C0-492D-4582-89B0-BEDABA2B0E6E@.microsoft.com...
> Since you haven't posted the code. I am guessing :)
> are you using the two part name where ever you refer to the table.
> I mean refer to all the table names as
> dbo.table1
> or whichever schema you are using.
> Hope this helps.|||Hey Jim..
long time no clashes.. was missing you :)
"Jim Underwood" wrote:

> Also, make sure the user running the stored procedure has access to the
> tables.
> "Omnibuzz" <Omnibuzz@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:2919D9C0-492D-4582-89B0-BEDABA2B0E6E@.microsoft.com...
>
>|||Lol. Yeah, you missed an entire day last w. All day long I was looking
for some posts from you. You usually have a few creative and thought
provoking solutions. I think today's is the negative flag * 2 +1 to get
either a positive or negative number. I had to get some caffeine before I
could figure it out.
Actually, I was hoping to see if you had a mathematical formula to solve the
matrix (Matriz) problem posted yesterday. The best I could come up with was
a mapping table. I couldn't seem to find a mathematical approach to the
problem, so I went with simple brute force.
"Omnibuzz" <Omnibuzz@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6FEE9DDC-CEBC-46B8-8AE1-17E1CCEE47A1@.microsoft.com...
> Hey Jim..
> long time no clashes.. was missing you :)
> "Jim Underwood" wrote:
>|||Gee...Thanks for the complments..
Well network was down yesterday.. and didn't see the post on matrix.. will
look into it now :)
"Jim Underwood" wrote:

> Lol. Yeah, you missed an entire day last w. All day long I was lookin
g
> for some posts from you. You usually have a few creative and thought
> provoking solutions. I think today's is the negative flag * 2 +1 to get
> either a positive or negative number. I had to get some caffeine before I
> could figure it out.
> Actually, I was hoping to see if you had a mathematical formula to solve t
he
> matrix (Matriz) problem posted yesterday. The best I could come up with w
as
> a mapping table. I couldn't seem to find a mathematical approach to the
> problem, so I went with simple brute force.
> "Omnibuzz" <Omnibuzz@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:6FEE9DDC-CEBC-46B8-8AE1-17E1CCEE47A1@.microsoft.com...
>
>